1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine; 50.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a halog car.

On February 11, 2013, the Defendant operated the above car at around 01:40, and made a two-lane from the 659 accounting line of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul to turn left in accordance with the two-lanes from among the three-lanes in the direction of the Green Fran Station at the seat of the hotel. Since the location at that time is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the Defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to proceed as instructed by signal apparatus and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the victim E (the 50-year-old taxi) driving in front of the victim E (the 50-year-old taxi) who was holding the intersection by the course signal from the left side of the mast-down direction by negligence in violation of the stop signal.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim G (29 years of age) who is a taxi passenger, such as salt pane, tensions, etc., which requires two-day medical treatment, and escaped without any measure such as stopping the damaged taxi to the extent that it damages the amount equivalent to KRW 1,956,246 of the repair cost, while leaving the taxi to the extent that it damages the amount equivalent to KRW 1,956,246.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements concerning E and G;

1. Relevant Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, each of the fines (including primary offenders, reflects, the purchase of comprehensive insurance, the minor damage, the agreement with some victims, the family relationship of the accused, and the life in good faith) for criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;