A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From September 198, the Defendant, as a business employee of the victim C Co., Ltd. in Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, has been engaged in the sales and collection of pulp acid “D”, a product of the victim company.

The defendant may set a unit price for the sales of goods to the business partner of the victim company, set the shipment price by entering the delivery price in a false manner in order to receive direct sales proceeds and surcharges in cash, and set the sales unit price for the goods to the business partner at a higher level, and used the difference and surcharges for personal use from November 9, 2005.

Around July 12, 2006, the Defendant: (a) collected an additional tax of KRW 195,00 from F, a business partner of the victim company E, and was in custody for the victim company; (b) was consumed for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc. from around that time to March 25, 2010; and (c) arbitrarily consumed an aggregate of KRW 45,465,50, which was kept in custody for the victim company, from around that time to around March 25, 201 through 53 times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table between around that time and around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Among the prosecutor's office and the third police interrogation protocol of the accused, the part concerning each G, the police's statement of G and the criminal complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes such as a statement of approval, list of offenses, written request for release, statement of customer, etc., and investigation report (number 10);

1. Relevant Article 356 of the Criminal Act, Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendant has made his best efforts to reflect his mistake and to recover damage, and the Defendant has made a statement to the effect that part of the amount of embezzlement has been repaid out of retirement benefits, and it does not seem to have made a false statement, and the period and each of the instant crimes are committed.