Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage to property;

A. At around 06:20 on July 29, 2013, the Defendant reported to the police when the former was unable to have avoided any disturbance from the original department on the first floor of D Hospital D Hospital C located in Busan Seo-gu, Busan, on the ground that he reported it to the police, the Defendant damaged the facilities managed by the victim E, who is the director general of the above hospital and the vice head of the above hospital, by obtaining a number of automatic doors from the outside of the elevator from the electric wheelchairs, on the ground that he reported it to the police.

B. At around 01:45 on July 31, 2013, the Defendant destroyed facilities managed by the Victim E by destroying air conditioners outer walls in the 605 room and air conditioners installed in the 605 corridor that were hospitalized by the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant controlled access during the late night time at the above hospital, as seen above, to tear down the remote area inside the 605 room, and damaged air conditioners’ outer wall.

2. The Defendant: (a) destroyed and damaged the body of the phone with the barr of a public telephone installed at a stairs between the fifth and the sixth floor of the above hospital; (b) stolen money which would be incurred in a plastic box prepared in advance and managed by the victim E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Investigation reports and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for a crime;

1. Article 10 (2) and (1), and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act that is legally mitigated;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant alleged that he was in a state of mental disorder at the time of committing each of the instant crimes, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes according to the records.