A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

around 11:00 on May 31, 2016, the Defendant 2016, on the 111:1:100, Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, called a telephone on May 31, 2016, but the police officer took a call on 112, using a public telephone prior to the 127 New Cooperatives, but she did not enter the Defendant’s horse, and she broken off the glass of the public telephone administered by the victim KT by the flooder.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the free will of the public telephone, which is managed by the injured party, so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 5,000,000 in the market.

"2016 Highest 3053"

1. Damage to property;

A. On May 21, 2016, the Defendant reported on May 21, 2016, using a public telephone on the front of Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, that “the Defendant was involved in fraud.” However, the police officer, who received a telephone, saw that “the Defendant was involved in fraud.” However, the police officer, who received the phone, endeded the phone and broken off the glass of the public telephone, managed by the victim KT by the flooder.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the free will of the public telephone that is managed by the injured party to cover the repairing cost of KRW 33,000 in the city.

B. On August 14, 2016, around 17:30, the Defendant reported to the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, that “The Defendant was subject to investigation because he was made a fraud 112 years prior to the ten-year period.” However, the police officer, who received the phone, cut off the phone and broken off the glass of the public telephone room managed by the victim KT as a flooder.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the public telephone side glass managed by the victim KT to cover the repairing cost of KRW 33,000 in the city.

2. Fraud;

A. On August 16, 2016, around 23:05, the Defendant ordered food equivalent to KRW 18,000,000, such as two pigs of swine in the F cafeteria operated by the Seo-gu Daejeon D Victim E.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

As such, the Defendant did not pay the amount of food equivalent to KRW 18,00 even after deceiving the victim, that is, he did not acquire economic benefits equivalent to the same amount of money.

B. The Defendant around 01:00 on August 22, 2016.