All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. On September 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was boarding a non-numbered vehicle on the street in front of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) the Defendant was a pro-friendly job E of the victim D (22 tax) who was suffering from the Madles.

“To mislead the misunderstanding of the misunderstanding of the vehicle as “......”

Accordingly, the defendant, who gets off the vehicle from the vehicle, assaults the victim's face at 10 times in the floor of hand, and walking the clothes at one time, and assaulted the victim's face at three times in the way of walking the f., and assaulted the victim's face at one time in the way of drinking and walking the f.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to the records of the instant case, the victims can be acknowledged as having withdrawn their wish to punish the Defendant by submitting a written agreement on June 24, 2016, which was after the prosecution of the instant case. Thus, all of the instant indictments are dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.