logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.18 2016고합392
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등
Text

Defendant

A Punishment of 5 years of imprisonment and fine of 55 million won with respect to the second crime in judgment, 2 million won of fine for the third crime in judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ status and status were the chairperson of the board of directors of the Korea R&D Corporation from December 8, 2010 to October 31, 2014. From November 3, 2014 to November 3, 2014, Defendant A, who was in charge of the management of the said Corporation, is a public official under Article 2 subparag. 3 (b) and 1 (d) of the Act on the Prevention of Corruption and the Establishment and Management of the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission, and Article 3 (1) 12 of the Public Service Ethics Act, and is deemed a public official of the crime of acceptance of bribe under Article 83 of the Local Public Enterprises Act.

Defendant

F is a balance between Defendant A and S market trend, known to the public for a period of up to two years.

Defendant

B is a person who has overall control over the management of a company established for the purpose of creative construction business (hereinafter referred to as “T”) and U(hereinafter referred to as “U”).

Defendant

C is a person who is in charge of the order of construction works of the above T or U while working in the above T or U, and is known about about 40 years by Defendant A’s trend line.

Defendant

D From 1993 to April 2016, a person who was an adviser of the regional committees of V Parties (former W Party) from 1993 to 20 years was known to Defendant A for more than 20 years, and the election campaign headquarters of the S market in 2010 and the X National Assembly member election campaign headquarters in 2012.

2. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. A. Around the end of 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) received solicitation that “U would give rise to failure to perform the construction works among the above housing construction projects,” relating to “Zin Housing Construction Projects (hereinafter “Zin”) which is a contractor, and “Y” (hereinafter “Y”) related to “Zin Housing Construction Projects (hereinafter “instant housing construction projects”).

Accordingly, the Defendant accepted C’s solicitation and visit C and AA to the office of the RR Urban Corporation Minister at the end of December 2012, 201, together with C and U.A., and visit AB to the office of the RR Urban Corporation Minister at the time.

arrow