A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

around 14:23 on January 2, 2018, the Defendant reported to the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, that the former husband, who was divorced from the subparagraph C, is entering the home, and sent to the site after being reported to the 112 report that the former husband, “in the house, is entering the house,” to the slope E belonging to the Seo-gu police station of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seoul, who called to the site, “I have left the place of her feste, I have been suffering from her

C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C., one hand, f.c. the back of the victimized person, and the other hand, the victim’s her t.m.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement of the witness F;

1. Recording-recording files CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the certificate of origin;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the criminal facts, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment, and the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the defendant and his/her defense counsel. At the time, the police officers opened a main visit and resisted to the police officers to take pictures using mobile phones. The police officers did not give specific answers and arrested the defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties, and the defendant resisted to the purport that the execution of official duties by the police officers was not legitimate.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed from evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the police officers informed the defendant that he was dispatched to the 112 report, the defendant was arrested in the act of committing the crime because he did not go to the police officer, and the photograph was taken after the arrest of the police officer, and the police officer's execution of official duties was legitimate.

I would like to say.

A. Police officers called F on F’s 112 report to F’s house, and police officers called F’s house by opening a door to enter the house.

The police officers entering the house are sent to the defendant with the F 112 report.