The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant alleged a misunderstanding of facts is only having a sexual intercourse under the agreement with the victim, and there was no quasi-rape of the victim as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

B. It is unfair that the sentence of the lower court’s sentencing (one and half years of suspended sentence in one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실 오인 주장에 대하여 피고인은 원심에서 이 사건 공소사실을 자백하였다가, 당 심에 이르러 이 사건 공소사실을 부인하고 있으나, 원심 및 당 심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피고인은 수사기관 이래 원심에 이르기까지 이 사건 공소사실을 모두 자백하였고, 피고 인의 위 자백은 피해자 및 목격자 G에 대한 각 경찰 진술 등 증거들 과도 부합하는 점, ② 피고인은 경찰 수사과정에서 이 사건 범행의 경과에 관하여 “ 몇 시쯤인지 모르겠는데 잠을 깼는데 순간적으로 성관계를 하고 싶은 생각이 들어 F( 피해자, 이하 같다 )에게 키스를 하면서 바지와 팬티를 벗겨 성관계를 했습니다.

Then, if F has a spirit of F, it shall be “to see, to see, to her own will”;

A man stated, “Isn, Isn only n, Isn,” that he left clothes “Iskn.” (Evidence No. 41 of the evidence record) and subsequently wrong with the above victim.

The defendant's statement was made even when he was down kneel keling (Evidence No. 42 of the evidence record). The defendant's statement made by the defendant is considerably specific and the victim's statement made at the time and consistent with the victim's and witness G's statement, and the defendant's statement made by the defendant is reliable.

In light of the above statement, the defendant's argument that the defendant had sexual intercourse under the agreement with the victim is not reliable, and the defendant was suffered from the victim after the crime of this case in the court of first instance.