The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is sent to C at a shocking (degrading for loading) of the string 1 ton of solid freight vehicles purchased under the name of the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant cargo vehicles”) by the Defendant.

Although there was no permit to proceed with customs clearance and export procedures, C brought the instant cargo vehicle at his own discretion and arbitrarily disposed of it, so the accusation is consistent with objective facts.

Therefore, the defendant committed a false accusation for the purpose of having the victim receive criminal punishment.

subsection (b) of this section.

2. The judgment is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below. ① The defendant's purchase of the freight of this case from F and clearly notified F that "A person engaged in the shocking of the freight of this case" is "C" (Evidence No. 1 No. 9 of the evidence record). ② The freight of this case was transferred to C with the freight of this case which was kept under the defendant's permission. Accordingly, the freight of this case was put into a showing place, and thereafter the dispute arises between the defendant and C [the 70 pages, 77, 78, 100 pages, 100, 104 pages, 104 pages, 109, 39, 56 pages, 61, 218, and 218 of the evidence record No. 1 of this case.

(3) the cargo of this case exported to KIKO is currently used by theO, and the C's criminal act was involved in that process.

There is no evidence to see that there is no evidence (No. 1 of evidence No. 1, No. 191 of the evidence record, rather, examining the dialogues with the evidence No. 6 submitted by the defendant in the trial of the party, the freight of this case is considered to have been exported to KIKO pursuant to the intention of the defendant C with the assent of the defendant).