Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the D restaurant located in Seopopopo City C around 21:30 on July 19, 2016, cut off the gap in which the victim E is taking meals; (b) at the entrance of the above cafeteria, the Defendant reported the fluence of the victim’s market price (500,000,000,000,000,000,000 won at the victim’s market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of a protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant;

1. E statements;

1. Images recorded in CCTV-recording CDs;

1. Relevant photographs, damaged photographs, visual images, and photographs;

1. The Defendant asserts that, under the influence of alcohol, the victim’s sand would be misunderstood as his/her sand and the report of investigation (as a result of theCCTV analysis and specification of the suspect), investigation report (a suspect A telephone statement, etc.), investigation report (as a result of the collection of the damaged products), and the attachment of his/her photo to the victim’s sand.

However, the victim's sand is about 5 cm bend and over 235 to 240 meters, the defendant's sand is almost 230 meters, and the victim's sand is about 230 meters. ② The victim's sand is relatively new and string materials, and the defendant's sand seems to be relatively old. ③ The victim's sand is flaging in the victim's sand. ③ The victim's sand is flag.

Although there is a large letter on the front part, the Defendant’s sand does not so, the Defendant’s sand does not seem to be drunk when viewed as CCTV images, and the Defendant does not look at the victim’s sand on the floor, and the Defendant believerss sand while seeing the victim’s sand, and ⑤ the Defendant did not trust his sand in the place where he is off his string, and reported the victim’s sand in a place where he is placed on the left end and in a rail, and the Defendant reported the victim’s sand sand on the following day of the occurrence of the instant case.

In light of the fact that the defendant stated about two weeks after the statement and did not take any measure from the police until the contact is received, the defendant's person.