beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, it is due to the fabrication of the 2017 Highest 5879 Check.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】 On September 30, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to four months and three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on September 30, 2009; on November 17, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on November 17, 201; on December 24, 2013 during the execution of the said sentence, the Defendant was released on December 24, 2013, and was exempted
1. The Defendant, from October 2015, concluded a check contract with the sublime branch of the D Bank from October 2015 and traded the check.
During the period from April 11, 2016 to April 25, 2016, the Defendant no longer paid on the date for presentation due to the shortage of deposits, as indicated in Table 1-1 of Crime List 1-1 below.
On April 11, 2016, the date of issuance of the check number and the check amount of E Bank F 20,000,000 won on April 13, 2016, the Defendant’s responsibility on December 13, 2015, the Defendant issued the Plaintiff a check amount of KRW 70,000,000 (the Defendant’s responsibility is KRW 55,000,000,000) from the victim’s company acquisition funds at the G Bank’s G Bank H 50,000,000 on April 25, 2016 on February 20, 2016 (the Defendant’s liability is KRW 55,00,000) under the name of the victim’s account at the meeting of Kim Jong-si operated by Kim Jong-si on September 13, 2016.
From the early October 2016 to November 4, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim stating, “If the Defendant fails to prevent the share sheet issued by the L-A-B-B-B-B-L-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B
However, in fact, the defendant did not have any particular property, and the credit rating company did not pay profits through normal business activities as the old-age corporation holding only the current account, and the defendant was in the name of the credit rating company from September 22, 2016 to October 4, 2016.