1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. In the instant case that was concluded on February 12, 2016 as of February 12, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant successively issued a seizure and collection order as to the said dividends by adding additional dividends to the Daee Environment Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Troan environment”) following the cancellation of execution and waiver of the dividends. However, the distribution court (the Plaintiff, as the lower court, as the Defendant was 2016TT1233 of this court on January 16, 2016, the Defendant was the debtor, the Republic of Korea was the third debtor, and the Defendant was issued a collection order as to the amount of KRW 41,44,901, among the claims for the collection of dividends in the said D distribution procedure, on the ground that the seizure order was null and void, and the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the said dividends and stated the purport of the entire distribution date as to the dividends on the grounds that it stated the distribution on the grounds that the entire distribution date in the instant procedure was stated on the distribution date of this case’s 201 to 20161.6.

2. The Plaintiff’s determination as to the cause of claim of the Plaintiff’s assertion argues that the content of the instant conciliation is unreasonable, in light of the content of the instant conciliation, that the Defendant would pay dividends to the Plaintiff when the Plaintiff withdraws a lawsuit of demurrer against the distribution from this Court No. 2016Da5103, and that the Defendant would receive dividends.

On the other hand, the part of the conciliation clause of this case 2. ' ' ' ' ' ' '' in the above part' has res judicata effect on the above part, even if there is an inappropriate face for the part in its reasoning.