logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.30 2016누39865
해임처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for dismissal or addition of the judgment of the first instance as follows.

On the 6th, 6, 9, 13, and 14th, each “this Court” used “6, 6, 9, 13, and 14 of the first instance judgment” as “the court of the first instance,” and “the court of the first instance submitted a written statement (No evidence No. 6) stating that “the plaintiff has no personal contact with him for the purpose of examination of witness” at the court of the first instance, and “6,” “6,” added “6,” and “the 7th, 6th, of the first instance judgment of the first instance,” which read “the 8th, 6th, and 11 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court of the first instance” as “the 6th, 6th,” and “the 111th of the second instance judgment of the first instance court of the first instance,” and “the following additional statement or evidence No. 81 of the first instance judgment of the first instance is insufficient in light of the following evidence No. 1 and evidence No. 81 of the first instance judgment.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow