The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On the Internet website on December 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sold the “E” account to the victim D at KRW 120,000,000; and (b) obtained 120,000 by changing the ID and password it sold on February 1, 2014.

2. The burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial for judgment is to be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction should be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, so long as there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt is between the defendant, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(2) The Defendant’s act of selling the above account under the name of 120,000 won by changing the ID and passwords of the above account to the effect that the Defendant’s act of selling 120,000 won by using the same account under the following circumstances (see Supreme Court Decision 2001Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001). In other words, the Defendant consistently sold 1.20,000 won to the Defendant since the investigative agency since then the investigation agency: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant’s act of selling the above account under the name of 1.20,00 won; and (c) the Defendant’s act of selling the above account under the name of 1.20,000 won by using the same normally after acquiring the above account from the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant’s act of selling the above account under the name of her intent to sell it to the Defendant, and then, (c) the Defendant’s act of selling it under the first account.