logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.09.01 2016고단1572
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2016 Highest 1572" is a person whose driver's license was revoked on April 8, 2016.

At around 10:30 on April 18, 2016, the Defendant driven a car without a driver’s license for a vehicle with approximately 10 km from the 10k-distance Man-si Man-si Man-si Man-si Man-si Man-si Man-si Man-si Man-si Man-si Man-

The defendant of "2016 Highest 2308" is a person whose driver's license was revoked on April 8, 2016.

On July 7, 2016, at around 05:25, the Defendant driven a car with approximately KRW 50 km from the roads of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City New History 2, 343-7, to the roads in the wife population and Kim Jong-dong, Gnicper without a car driver's license.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 1572]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Report on the situation of operation without a license (2016 highest 2308);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the statutes on the register of driver's licenses;

1. Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the same Act concerning the punishment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (the crime of this case committed by driving the same vehicle without a driver’s license even though two or more times the criminal records of sound driving and three or more times the criminal records of unauthorized driving, and in particular, the nature of the crime is minor in light of the fact that the defendant was served with a copy of the indictment of this case in the case of 2016Kadan1572 and repeatedly repeated the case of 2016Kadan2308 without being aware of the judgment even though he/she was waiting for the judgment, etc. However, the fact that the defendant was not subject to punishment exceeding a fine, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow