logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.04.15 2014고정1135
변호사법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a licensed administrative agent.

1. He/she shall not handle or arrange any act of receiving or promising to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits, or to provide or promising to provide such things to a third party, in connection with cases of litigation, etc., such as appraisal, representation, arbitration, settlement, solicitation, legal consultation, preparation of legal documents, and other legal affairs, and shall not intervene in other person's lawsuit or other legal relationship dispute or civil petition processing process beyond the scope of a licensed administrative agent's services;

On January 31, 2011, the Defendant entered into a false contract for transfer or takeover of claims with D's office located in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, Seoul Metropolitan Area, with D's office located in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, "E is a creditor in the Republic of Korea who has transferred the claims to E, and if the claims have been recovered, 30% of the collected claims shall be changed to the revenue rate." On March 7, 2011, the Defendant acquired a false contract for transfer or takeover of claims with D's claim 11,00,000 won from D's office located in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, Seoul Metropolitan Area, Seoul Metropolitan Area, with the public service order of the Seoul Metropolitan Area, which was located in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, with the payment order of KRW 11,00,000 and KRW 20% of the annual amount from the date on which the payment order was served to the date on which the payment order was served, and remitted to E's office with the payment order of KRW 30% 10,100,301.

As a result, the defendant, not attorneys-at-law, handled legal affairs concerning lawsuits, etc., and at the same time participated in lawsuits of others beyond the scope of business affairs of administrative agencies.

2. The Defendant received remittance of KRW 11,00,000 from E as described in the preceding paragraph, and received KRW 7,700,000,000 from E, for the purpose of victim D, the Defendant was the agricultural bank account in the name of the victim while keeping for the purpose of victim D.

arrow