logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1970. 11. 24.자 70마692 결정
[부동산경락허가결정에대한재항고][집18(3)민,272]
Main Issues

Public notice of auction date, in which any entry of tax or other public imposts is omitted, shall not be required to be a legitimate public notice.

Summary of Judgment

Public notice of auction date, in which any entry of tax or other public imposts is omitted, shall not be required to be a legitimate public notice.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 618 of the Civil Procedure Act

Re-appellant

Re-appellant

United States of America

Daegu District Court Order 70Ra88 dated September 9, 1970

Text

The original decision shall be reversed and the first instance decision shall be revoked.

This case is rejected.

Reasons

The judgment on the grounds of reappeal;

According to the records, it is evident that the public notice of auction date of this case does not include any tax or other public imposts in the public notice of auction date, so the public notice of auction date omitted can not be deemed a legitimate public notice meeting the requirements under Article 618 of the Civil Procedure Act, and therefore, it constitutes a ground for not allowing ex officio successful bid, which is not a legally stipulated public notice of auction date. Therefore, the argument on this point is reasonable.

Therefore, it is decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

[Judgment of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) Nabri-dong and Dobri-Jaking Hanwon

arrow