logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.07 2017고단4181
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and a fine of ten million won, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of ten months, and Defendant C with prison labor of six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From the beginning of February 2017, a business owner operating a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office 412, 517, 519, 930, and 1012 is the head of the said business establishment, Defendant B is the head of the said business establishment, Defendant C is the head of the night office of the said business establishment, and Defendant D is the head of the said business establishment.

From early February 2017 to March 15, 2017, the Defendants: (a) posted a commercial sex trade advertisement by arbitrarily stating the pictures of the model dedicated to the Internet site “M”, “N, etc.; and (b) the age, height, chest size, etc. of women engaged in commercial sex acts at the above business establishment; (c) promised to receive KRW 110,00 to receive KRW 150,00 from the male members of the said commercial sex purchase who had contacted with the said advertisement at the price of commercial sex acts; and (d) notified the said female members of the said commercial sex purchase to receive KRW 150,00 from the female members of the said commercial sex purchase to receive KRW 150,00,000,000 from the female members of the said commercial sex purchase to the guest rooms; and (e) ordered them to perform the act of similarity in the way of impairing the sexual flag of the said female members by entering the business and hand.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. No person who violates the Educational Environment Protection Act shall operate a business establishment banned from access by or employment of juveniles under the Juvenile Protection Act in an area within 200 meters from the boundary of an educational environment protection zone;

Nevertheless, from the early February 2017 to March 15, 2017, the Defendants operated commercial sex acts establishments as described in paragraph (1), at around 56.94 meters from the R elementary school warning area located in Q Q in Gangnam-gu Seoul, at approximately 56.94 meters.

Accordingly, the Defendant operated a business prohibited from access to and employment of juveniles under the Act on the Protection of Juveniles in Areas within 200 meters from the boundary of educational environment protection zones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Legal statements of the witness C and D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant A or B by the prosecution;

1.O, P.

arrow