A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 3764"

1. On October 5, 2014, from around 21:00 to 23:30 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business with C, who drinks in the “F Publication Board” room 26, operated by the victim E in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul), and C, by viewing the urine on the hallway of the Gosiwon, continued to resist the victim by failing to sleep for about 2 hours and 30 minutes.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C to interfere with the victim's notification source business by force.

2. On October 5, 2014, at around 22:40 on October 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed that he expressed that he would be able to ask H anywhere he will be forced to go her, and that he will go her early from the Gyeongjin Police Station G District G District at the Seoul Mine Police Station G District, which was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 at the place under paragraph (1); and (b) assaulted H’s chest by her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on handling 112 reports.

The defendant of "2015 Highest 1251" interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reports by deceptive means on three occasions as follows.

1. On February 21, 2015, the Defendant reported to the 112 comprehensive situation room at the Defendant’s residence located in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu I on February 21, 2015, that “the date of death is the day of death; hereinafter the same shall apply)” to police officers whose name cannot be identified by calling a telephone at the 112 comprehensive situation room.

2. On February 22, 2015, at around 07:18, the Defendant reported to the general situation room at the above Defendant’s residence that “a police officer, who could not know his/her name because he/she had a telephone to the general situation room at the 112 situation room, made a false report stating that “a police officer is under intimidation. In other cases, as soon as possible, it differs from that of other

3. The Defendant: (a) on February 22, 2015, at around 10:13, the foregoing, to a police officer, who was unable to identify the name of the Defendant by calls from the 112 general situation room at the above Defendant’s residence; and (b) was kidnapped to the bond broker.