logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.01.26 2017가합63
토지사용료 등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 19,184,168 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from August 29, 2017 to January 26, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff (name C before the opening of a name) is the owner of ① 516 square meters in the field of Pakistan, ② 1,091 square meters in the field of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as “Friland”), ③ 1,019 square meters in the field of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as “Hri land”), ③ 1,019 square meters in the field of Pakistan and 1,872 square meters in the city of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as “K-dong land” in addition to each real estate indicated in the attached Form; hereinafter referred to as “the sum of the two land”).

(B) The sum of all the above land is “each of the instant land” and, when referring to the following land, referring to “D land” in the same form as “D land.”

In around 2008, the Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant to divide the expropriation compensation, including the compensation for obstacles to the planting trees, in the case where the said land is expropriated later after planting trees, while allowing the Defendant to planted and use the trees on each of the instant land that was originally discussed.

(B) B. The Defendant purchased from L around early 2008 eight (8) eight (8) years of pine trees, 50 (8) years of pine trees, 550 (8) years of pine trees, and 100 (7) years of pine trees, and planted the said trees after installing facilities, such as plastic houses, on the said Friland.

C. However, on March 24, 2008, the so-called "Pju Mayor" notified the plaintiff on March 24, 2008 that the land E among the above Friland was designated and publicly announced as a prospective M housing site development district and that the planting of trees is restricted pursuant to the Housing Site Development Promotion Act, and notified the plaintiff that he would file a criminal complaint and take measures for vicarious

Nevertheless, the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not restore the Friland according to its existing form, and the so-called so-called so-called the Plaintiff, on January 30, 2009, filed an accusation against the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,500,000 for violating the Housing Site Development Promotion Act (Seoul Support 2008, 1835), and paid the said fine.

The defendant shall move trees which were planted on the above E-land around 2009 into K-dong land.

arrow