1. The Defendant’s KRW 60,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from April 16, 2012 to April 9, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

1. In light of the facts stated in Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 5, and 6 (including the serial number) and the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap's testimony around August 3, 201, the defendant provided a subcontract for E additional E additional construction works located in Busan Shipping Daegu D. The plaintiff paid the construction price on behalf of the defendant at Eul's request, and the plaintiff and the defendant agreed that the amount of the plaintiff's subrogation is KRW 60 million. The defendant agreed that the amount of the plaintiff's subrogation is KRW 60 million around March 26, 2012, and the defendant provided that "the defendant will pay the plaintiff KRW 60,000,000,000,000 as additional construction cost to the constructor C of the above building up to KRW 60,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,0000 won, 20,000 won.

2. The defendant's argument as to the defendant's assertion is alleged to be that since the plaintiff made a mistake on the part of the plaintiff immediately after signing the letter of commitment to the payment of this case and the plaintiff did not deliver it to the plaintiff, the declaration of intent to abolish the letter of commitment to the payment of this case has not been completed. Thus, the health team