beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 60 million with 15% per annum from April 24, 2016 to the date of complete payment.
Reasons
1. The allegations and judgment of the parties
A. Determination as to the cause of the claim 1) The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entry and the entire argument as to the evidence No. 1 in the evidence No. 1 and the purport of the entire argument. The Defendant agreed on an exclusive management agreement concluded on February 28, 2015 with the Plaintiff, D, which is a joint representative of the C company, on June 24, 2014, and the amount of KRW 50 million out of the investment amount paid by the planning company up to March 31, 2015, and the remainder of KRW 10 million shall be paid within 30 days from the date the Defendant commenced the entertainment activities (see evidence No. 1 of this case; hereinafter referred to as the “instant payment note”).
However, the Defendant prepared and delivered the above amount. However, the Defendant did not pay the payment amount up to the present day. 2) Of the payment note of this case, KRW 10 million is to be paid within 30 days from the date the Defendant commenced entertainment activities. As long as the Defendant did not engage in entertainment activities, it is reasonable to view that the payment period has already arrived at the time of April 23, 2016, when the original copy of the payment order of this case was served on the Defendant.
3. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 60 million and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from April 24, 2016 to the date of full payment after the original copy of the instant payment order was served on the Defendant, as the Plaintiff seeks.
B. On the part of the defendant's argument, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff and D forced the plaintiff to prepare the letter of payment of this case by using the defendant's weak points that they may know Korean and Korean law, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion cannot be accepted.
2. For this reason, we accept the Plaintiff’s claim in entirety and decide as per Disposition.