The judgment below

The guilty part shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

(2) the date of this judgment.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On November 22, 2011, Defendant 1 submitted by the prosecutor related to the opposing assembly of the US FTA on November 22, 2011, and only the fact that the Defendant was temporarily engaged in fishidine on or around November 22, 2011. However, as shown in the facts charged, the Defendant, as well as the opposite participants of the Korea-U.S. FTA held before the Hongdong-dong Quakker Quaker, did not occupy eight lanes prior to the opposite participants of the Korea-U.S. FTA held in Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul.

In addition, the prosecutor could not identify or prove that the defendant has occupied the lane for a minimum time for the establishment of traffic obstruction.

B) On November 26, 2011, the prosecutor submitted a test related to the opposing assembly of the Korea-U.S. FTA and the defendant temporarily fell under the languageidine around 19:58 on November 26, 2011 only by means of a documentary evidence. However, as shown in the facts charged, there was no fact that the defendant occupied the eight-lane distance from the world to the third class in Jongno-gu, Seoul, along with the participants in the opposing assembly of the Sejong Culture Center held before the Sejong Culture Center located in 175 as Seoul Jongno-gu, as shown in the facts charged.

In addition, the prosecutor could not identify or prove that the defendant has occupied the lane for a minimum time for the establishment of traffic obstruction.

C) On December 10, 2011, the prosecutor submitted a survey related to the opposing assembly of the Korea-U.S. FTA and the Defendant was temporarily engaged in a fishidine on December 10, 201 only by means of a documentary evidence, on or around 20:54, December 10, 2011. However, as shown in the facts charged, there was no fact that the Defendant, as well as the participants in the opposing assembly of the Korea-U.S. FTA, held in India on the south side of the Cheongndong-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul, occupied the eight-lane way near the entrance of the Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, along with the participants in the opposing assembly of the Korea-U.S. FTA.

In addition, the prosecutor could not identify or prove that the defendant has occupied the lane for a minimum time for the establishment of traffic obstruction.

D) On June 16, 2012, a prosecutor involved in the assembly to walk, such as a pair of vehicles.