logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.10.20 2015고단1198
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:55 on March 28, 2015, the Defendant asked questions to the Defendant by the police officers belonging to the Gyeongginam Police Station of the Gyeongginam Police Station, who called up after receiving a report on the assault case near the F cafeteria on the same day, in order to verify the facts, the Defendant, without any special reason, took a bath to the said G at one time, and the police officers belonging to the same Gyeongginam Police Station located next to the said G at one time stop the Defendant, and the police officers belonging to the same Gyeongginam Police Station located next to the said G at one time stop with his hand when the Defendant was arrested and detained in the act of obstruction of the performance of official duties. For the foregoing reason, when the Defendant was arrested on the part of the above G and H’s bridge part during the process of arresting the Defendant for committing an act of obstruction of the performance of official duties, the Defendant was on the part of the said G and H’s bridge for taking medical treatment for about 14 days.

At around 18:42 of the same day, the Defendant continued to open the bucks of police officers belonging to the Gyeongginam Police Station, where the Defendant was requested by the Defendant to cover the bucks of the bucks in hand and confirmed the status of the Defendant, and continued to open the bucks of the police officers belonging to the Gyeongginam Police Station, where the Defendant confirmed the status of the Defendant, the Defendant opened the bucks of the bucks for about 14 days to the above I.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the police officer who performs legitimate duties such as crime prevention and suppression, and inflicted an injury on the victim G(31 years of age) and victim I(29 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. Written statements of J, K, L and M;

1. Photographs of the CCTV screen of a police box;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each damaged party photo;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow