1. Of the rooftop floors of the real estate listed in the attached list, the Defendant shall indicate 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

1. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings, the facts stated in the evidence Nos. 1 through 10, evidence Nos. 11-1 through 6, A, 12, and 13 as to the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim, the Defendant is obligated to leave the Plaintiff out of approximately 13 square meters of the part on board (a) of the real estate on the rooftop floor (hereinafter “the part in possession of this case”) connected with each of the items in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 0, 00 square meters of the separate sheet among the real estate on the rooftop floor in the separate sheet.

2. On September 10, 2015, the Defendant asserted that: (a) Nonparty C entered into a lease agreement with the owner of the instant portion on September 10, 2015; (b) KRW 2 million per month; and (c) the Plaintiff would only pay KRW 500,000 to C with compensation following the implementation of the instant project; (c) the aforementioned transfer cost is too small to the directors; and (d) the Plaintiff’s possession of the instant portion by obtaining permission from C until the Plaintiff received lawful compensation for losses.

As recognized above, the defendant does not have any legal right to possess and use the occupied portion of this case, and the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.