1. The quasi-examination of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of quasi-examination shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Final decision in lieu of the conciliation subject to quasi-examination;

1. Upon the Defendant’s transfer of ownership of Gwangju Northern-gu E 34 square meters (hereinafter “instant E site”), the Defendant shall implement the procedure for the transfer registration of ownership on the instant land based on agreement on August 19, 2004 with respect to the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff acquired ownership.

2. In a case where the Defendant did not transfer the ownership of the instant building site, the Plaintiff and the Defendant divide the 62.5 square meters out of the instant land into the Plaintiff’s ownership, and 59.5 square meters into the Defendant’s ownership.

3. The Plaintiff and the Defendant, regardless of the ownership transfer of the instant building site, confirmed that the building on the instant land was owned by the Plaintiff, and since the location of the building on the real estate register injury was F of Gwangju Northern-gu, the Plaintiff cooperates with the Defendant in changing the building to Gwangju Northern-gu C.

4. The plaintiff waives the remaining claims.

5. The costs of lawsuit and the costs of mediation shall be borne by each person;

In this case between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Gwangju District Court rendered a decision in lieu of conciliation (hereinafter “decision in lieu of conciliation of this case”) on August 19, 2004 as follows, and the said decision was finalized on September 11, 2004.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence No. 3, purport of whole pleadings

2. Judgment as to the existence of a ground for quasi-examination

A. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion is purporting to seek the revocation of the decision in lieu of the conciliation of this case through quasi-deliberation since the defendant did not fulfill the conditions or commitments prescribed in the decision in lieu of the conciliation of this case.

B. A suit for determination-based and quasi-deliberation may be brought in cases where there are grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 451(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.

The ground for quasi-examination asserted by the Plaintiff is not only clear in itself that it does not fall under any of its causes, but also the conciliation of this case.