1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is the defendant's status of the parties to a clan which is composed of descendants of the defendant's clan 9 years old E as a joint ancestor, and the plaintiff is the member of the defendant's clan.

B. The contents of the existing rules of the defendant clan [Attachment] No. 2 of Chapter 2, the plenary session members of Article 4 (Qualification Members) of the previous defendant clan are one adult per household with E’s own loss.

Chapter 3 Officers and Officers of the Organization (Election of Officers) shall be elected at a general meeting with the consent of a majority of the members present.

Article 8 (Term of Office) The term of office of officers shall be three years, and they may be reappointed.

The members and executive officers of the defendant's old clan rules amended on December 29, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the "former clan rules") shall be as follows:

C. On March 15, 2015, on March 15, 2015, the Defendant of the Defendant’s regular closing session held a regular closing session on March 15, 2015, and made a resolution to amend the membership of F, general G, similar G, financial standing H, I, and J (hereinafter “resolution to elect executive officers”) and Article 4 of the Defendant’s clan Regulations to the effect that “the members at the plenary session shall be the adults with E’s descendants” (hereinafter “resolution to amend the Rules”), including the “resolution to elect executive officers” and “resolution to amend the Rules” (hereinafter “instant resolution”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 3, Eul evidence No. 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) although the plaintiff of the old clan argued that it is a violation of Article 4 of the articles of association of the defendant clan, it is the same content as that of Article 4 of the old clan Regulations, and therefore, it shall be decided as such. According to Article 4, only one adult per household must be given membership. However, the resolution of this case was made by two persons for one household, such as H and K, L, M, F, and N. This is invalid because it is a resolution made by a non-member. 2) The member elected by the chairperson of the clan as a member of the clan sold the clan property without the resolution of the clan members, and is a financial similar.