logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.08 2019고단7618
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2019, the Defendant, as a foreigner of Malaysia’s nationality, conspiredd with a Malaysia to commit a singishing crime by accepting a proposal, with the knowledge that the Defendant would play a role in the cash delivery liability of the Malaysia’s cash delivery system, on the following grounds: “Once the Defendant received money from another person or a member of the Malaysia, 2% of the money that he received from another person in Korea, and 3% of the money that he received from the Malaysia, 3% of the money that he received from the Malaysia, shall be paid to the designated person, and all of the countermeasures such as return flight tickets, accommodation expenses, and transportation expenses, shall be resolved.”

According to the above public offering, a false statement of false call to many unspecified domestic people and demands money from them, and the defendant or another non-name assistance employee in the name of the defendant or the victim will take the role of collecting money from the victim and delivering it to other assistance personnel.

According to the above division of roles, at around 14:28, May 30, 2019, the investigating staff called the victim AH by phoneing the victim AH at a place unclaimed on May 30, 2019. In fact, even though he did not capture the victim’s children, he made a false statement to the effect that “AH’s guarantee was made, and that the person was engaged in kidnapping the son instead of the escape, and that he would unfold the son with cash of KRW 20 million.”

At around 15:18 on the same day, the Defendant continued to receive 19.9 million won in cash from the victim in the middle-gu 47 street, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, 12:18 on the same day.

As a result, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the employees of scaming in person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to AH by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal accidents (the results of CCTV analysis around the site of occurrence);

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts are as follows.

arrow