logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) (변경)대법원 1991. 5. 28. 선고 88누7248 판결
[법인세부과처분취소][집39(2)특,508;공1991.7.15.(900),1800]
Main Issues

Whether the special relationship under Article 46 (1) 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act is established in case where a taxpayer corporation trades with another corporation having received its investment as an investor as the other party (affirmative)

Summary of Judgment

In a case where a corporation which is liable for tax payment trades with another corporation or an individual who is in the status of an investor with respect to the corporation, the special relationship under Article 46 (1) 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act is established as well as the special relationship under Article 46 (1) 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act. On the contrary, the special relationship is established in a case where the corporation which is liable for tax payment directly trades with

[Reference Provisions]

Article 20 of the Corporate Tax Act, Article 46 (1) 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act

Reference Cases

[Plaintiff-Appellant] Plaintiff 1 and 1 other (Law Firm Domin, Attorneys Park Jae-soo and 1 other, Counsel for plaintiff-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellee-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant-Appellee-Appellee-Appellee-Appellee-Appellant

Plaintiff-Appellee

Educational Foundation:

Defendant-Appellant

Head of Suwon Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 84Gu1117 delivered on May 19, 198

Text

The part of the judgment below against the defendant is reversed and that part of the case is remanded to the Seoul High Court.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the defendant litigant are examined.

According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below held that even if the corporation is a shareholder of the non-party company, it cannot be denied the calculation of the act because it reserveds the non-party company without receiving dividends from the non-party company, on the ground that the non-party company is a shareholder of the non-party company, and the non-party company reserved the same without receiving dividends from the non-party company without receiving dividends from the non-party company.

However, in case where a certain corporation which is liable for tax payment makes a transaction with another corporation or an individual who is in the status of an investor with respect to the corporation, the special relation as provided by Article 46 (1) 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act shall be established as well as the special relation as well as the case where the corporation which is liable for tax payment voluntarily makes a transaction with the other corporation which is in the status of an investor and has received the investment as the other party, the above special relation shall be established. If the transaction is deemed to have reduced the tax burden on the corporation's income, the calculation of the act or income amount may be denied (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 83Nu84, Apr. 10, 1984; 83Nu160, Mar. 26, 1985; 87Nu901, Jan. 17, 1989). Accordingly, it is obvious that this has affected the judgment.

Therefore, the part of the judgment below against the defendant is reversed, and this part of the case is remanded to the court below. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Choi Jae-ho (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1988.5.19.선고 84구1117