logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.28 2015고단2546
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On January 18, 200, around 10:56, the Defendant’s employee A violated the restriction on vehicle operation of the road management agency by operating the 11.51t cargo loaded on the 4 livestock, exceeding 10t of the 19.8km of the 19.8km of the west Coast Highway, at the Gun Highway Corporation’s business office, in excess of the 10t of the 10th weight of the B

2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation provided for in Article 83(1)2 in Article 86 of the above Act, the Constitutional Court shall be punished by a fine provided for in the corresponding Article, even the corporation."

3. As such, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow