logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.24 2015고단828
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 15, 1998, around 18:37, the Defendant’s employees C violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by a road management agency by operating the 11.4t cargo loaded on the 4 axis in excess of 10t of the 10t weight of D freight vehicles owned by the Defendant at the business office of the senior branch office of the Korea Highway Corporation at a point of 88 Expressway 32.5km.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation provided for in Article 83(1)2 in Article 86 of the above Act, the Constitutional Court shall be punished by a fine provided for in the corresponding Article, even the corporation."

3. As such, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow