Text
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the representative of occupants of the first apartment house in South-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.
1. On March 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) even though the victim C was elected as the representative of each building on April 30, 2011, the Defendant, despite having resigned his/her eligibility as the representative of each building, destroyed the honor of the victim by distributing and posting printed materials to the effect that “The victim submitted a resignation letter on May 9, 201, and this constitutes a resignation of the representative of each building for which he/she had the existing tenure of office, which is not the elected person; and (b) the Defendant, on the bulletin board of the apartment occupant, the elevator and the passage, in order to interfere with the departure of the member.”
2. On March 11, 2015, the Defendant distributed and posted printed materials to the same purport in the above apartment in the same manner, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.
2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. Since it can be acknowledged that the victim expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the Defendant on April 23, 2015, which was the date the instant prosecution was instituted, the victim expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the Defendant, the prosecution of the instant case shall be dismissed under Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and it is so decided as per Disposition