logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.02.07 2017고단2645
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 1, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor due to interference with the execution of official duties, etc. in the support of the Suwon Friwon, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 19, 2015.

"2017 Highest 2645"

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On May 12, 2017, the Defendant 16:40 around 16:40, on the front of the 'E' restaurant operated by the victim D (43 S) (hereinafter referred to as 'E'), the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, obstructed the victim's restaurant business by avoiding approximately 30 minutes of the instant restaurant, such as seeing the rejection in front of the said restaurant (120cm in length, 120cm in total), putting the click on the ground, and cutting off the click in front of the said restaurant, and placing the click in front of the said restaurant, by force, having the customers in front of the said restaurant move to the place of damage to the Defendant.

B. On June 23, 2017, the Defendant continued to 20 minutes of a disturbance between approximately 20 minutes, i.e., e., the victim G (V. 52 years of age) who was in F when light blicking around 21:0, and i.e., the victim’s name was changed by a large noise while under the influence of alcohol, and the victim’s name was demanded to change from the damaged person during his/her disturbance. On the front of the entrance of the above head of the head of the head of the head of the head office, the Defendant continued to take the victim’s blick at around 20 minutes of a disturbance, i.e., “s., s., weather, opening, see the opening,” and see a large sound, thereby interfering with the victim’s heading business by force.

(c)

On July 28, 2017, the Defendant avoided disturbance between 20 minutes and interfered with the victim’s heading business by force, and interfered with the victim’s heading business by force. In light of the above, the Defendant’s 20 minutes of disturbance, i.e., e., “H” operated by the victim G (W, 52 years of age) of F when lighting around 22:0.

(d)

On July 29, 2017, around 00:40 on July 29, 2017, the Defendant committed a disturbance of about 20 minutes, including: (a) around the entrance door of “H” operated by the victim G (W, 52 years of age); (b) the Defendant was unable to take a lux flag in his possession; and (c) the Defendant took a bath with the victim’s name large interest; and (d) the Defendant committed a disturbance of about 20 minutes, and (e) the other customers.

arrow