A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On April 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing business operations at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at Anyang Prison on August 24, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. From November 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed, around November 14, 2016, the victim D (hereinafter “E cafeteria”); (b) expressed, under the influence of alcohol, that “the son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son; and (c) expressed the son son son son son son son; and (d) expressed the son son son’s son son son son son son son son son son son son son son; and (d) obstructed the victim’

2. From February 13, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store management by force around 50 minutes, such as: (a) around February 13, 2017, at the H convenience store managed by the F Victim G of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government, where the Defendant drinks while drinking alcohol; (b) was prevented from purchasing goods by customers; and (c) went out of the facility; and (d) again went out of the facility; and (b) again went back to the said facility, and then called “YYY, Young-gu, Choh, Choh, and Choh” with sound, thereby bringing hot water, thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store management by force.

3. Interference with the business affairs on November 8, 2016 [2017 Height 2357] The Defendant expressed a hump to the victim’s “K” house operated by the victimJ located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on November 8, 2016, and without any special reason, expressed the victim’s hump to the name-free customers who were in the place without any justifiable reason, and the said customers prevented the Defendant, thereby interfering with the victim’s hump business by exerting force, such as threatening the said customers to hump with dangerous things outside the restaurant, and threatening them to hump the said customers.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment 1] Facts (2016 order 7795)

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. D. L. each.