logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.21 2014가합34817
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. Defendant D shall within the scope of the property inherited from the network E:

A. Plaintiff A Co., Ltd.: KRW 52,000,000 and KRW 52,00.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff B is the representative director of the plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "A").

The deceased E (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) worked for the Plaintiff from August 29, 1996 to the Plaintiff and retired from office around September 26, 201, and returned on November 9, 201, and finally retired from office on August 30, 2012, and Defendant D is the deceased’s children.

Defendant C married with the Deceased on November 18, 1997, but was married on September 21, 201.

B. Around February 2007, the Deceased and Defendant D’s cooperation with the Plaintiff (A) had the Plaintiff Nonparty B urged the Plaintiff to pay KRW 27 million for the lease apartment house rent from around August 2001 to the tax office, and reported the omission of taxes to the Plaintiff’s tax office, and had the Plaintiff drinking Plaintiff B waives the above loan claim, thereby causing the Plaintiff to gain pecuniary advantage equivalent to KRW 27 million from the Plaintiff.

B) On October 4, 2011, the Deceased demanded the return of the real estate on the 397 square meters of the F forest land, which was trusted in the name of the Deceased, from the Plaintiff B, around July 4, 2003, and had the Plaintiff B waive the right to claim the registration of ownership transfer of the said real estate, thereby causing the Plaintiff B to bring about property gains equivalent to KRW 12 million from the Plaintiff. C) On October 201, the Deceased failed to inform the Plaintiff B of his car (G) and reported the illegal extension to the tax office and the competent government office. On October 27, 2011, the Deceased received necessary documents from the Plaintiff to transfer and register the ownership transfer of the said real estate, thereby causing the Plaintiff to bring about property gains equivalent to KRW 13 million from the Plaintiff.

2) The deceased and the Defendant D’s co-principal who jointly committed an offense against the Plaintiff B, are on a tax invoice by the deceased and the Plaintiff A while managing the Plaintiff.

arrow