beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for six months, respectively.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In order to stabilize the residence of homeless workers and ordinary people, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport has operated a loan system for the lease-related documents, such as the lease contract with the National Housing Fund on a fixed date without any special security, and employment-related documents, such as employment receipts for source collection of wage and salary income, “a loan system is granted to a certain amount out of the deposit for lease at a low interest rate,” and the victim bank is entrusted with the loan of the funds for the lease of the funds for the lease of
Defendant
A was heard from Defendant B that he would sell 106, 203, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, which he owned by Defendant B, or that he would sell 106, 203, or set up a false real estate lease agreement on the above apartment, and used it by dividing the above apartment by receiving a loan from the B’s team lease fund.
The defendant B accepted the proposal of the defendant A.
According to the above mother, the Defendants prepared a false apartment lease contract with respect to the above apartment at a place in the vicinity of February 10, 2015, and remitted the down payment of KRW 10 million to Defendant B’s account. On February 11, 2015, the Seoul Northern District Court’s registration office located in Dongdaemun-ro Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, received the fixed date of the above apartment lease contract from the Seoul Northern District Court’s registry office, and around February 16, 2015, filed an application for the loan of the lease of the lease of the apartment with the employees in charge of the name in the front branch of the victim bank located in Seongbuk-dong Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.
In addition, Defendant B, under the name of E (State) operated by himself, gave the Defendant a certificate of employment and the benefit ledger, etc., and actually concluded a lease contract to question the employees of the victim bank who asked whether to conclude a lease contract.
The answer was made.
However, the Defendants actually concluded a lease contract for the above apartment.