Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the explanation in this part of the basic facts is as stated in the part of "1. Recognizing the facts of recognition" from 14th to 16th 5th 16th 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
2. The plaintiffs' assertion
A. Even after the conclusion of the instant trust contract, the Defendant continued to take charge of the sale, advertisement, and publicity of the instant resort in Korea.
The fact that Korea's World Trade Association concludes the instant resort membership sales contract with the plaintiffs, and receives such membership fees is based on the power of representation or agency for the conclusion of the sales contract which was duly granted by the defendant.
Therefore, the sales contract that Korea-Japan concluded with the plaintiffs shall have its effect on the defendant.
However, Article 9(3) of the membership contract states, “If a person becomes unable to use the instant resort due to reasons such as the completion site of an executing trustee, etc., for more than three months from December 201, which is the scheduled date of use of the instant resort, the buyer may rescind this contract.” Thus, even after the lapse of three months from December 201, the completion of the instant resort has not been completed.
For this reason, the plaintiffs cancelled the sales contract to the defendant by serving the duplicate of the complaint of this case.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff Ework 1,4850,000 won, the Plaintiff A, B, and C respectively, and the damages for delay on each of the above money, as the refund of the membership fee.
B. Even if the right of representation or agency regarding the conclusion of the sales contract is not recognized to Korea's chidrid, Korea's chidnet has the right to carry out de facto sales activities, such as the promotion of the instant chidnet and the solicitation of buyers, and there were reasonable grounds to believe that the Plaintiffs had the right of representation regarding the conclusion of the sales contract to Korea's chidnet.
Therefore, the Civil Code.