1. The Defendant: (a) each of the KRW 15 million to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties and the Defendant’s each of them, from October 21, 2017 to May 201, 2018.

1. On December 13, 2006, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Appointor entered into a sales contract with the Defendant to pay the sales price of KRW 170 million to the buyer’s real estate owned by the buyer of the instant land at KRW 400 among the instant land in exchange for the documents necessary for the registration of the transfer of ownership after the completion date and in exchange for the remainder of the sales contract to pay KRW 30 million to the buyer of the instant land at KRW 400,000.

The Appointer C and E also determined the sale price of G 28 square meters as KRW 170 million with the Defendant on the same day, but the down payment of KRW 30 million with KRW 20 million on December 13, 2006 and KRW 10 million on December 20, 2006 and concluded a sales contract to pay the sale price of the instant land at KRW 400 on the real estate owned by the buyer in exchange for documents necessary for the registration of transfer of ownership after the completion date, and the remainder was paid at KRW 20 million on December 20, 2006.

(2) The Plaintiff paid 10 million won to the Defendant on December 13, 2006, the Plaintiff paid 10 million won on December 13, 2006, the amount of KRW 5 million on December 28, 2006, the amount of KRW 10 million on December 20, 2006, the amount of KRW 5 million on January 4, 2007, and KRW 10 million on December 20, 2006, and KRW 30 million on December 20, 2006, and KRW 30 million on December 28, 2006, and KRW 50 million on December 28, 2006, respectively.

On the other hand, at the time of each of the instant sales contracts, the parties at the time of each of the instant sales contracts set the scheduled date for completion of the G pension and the scheduled date for use as of December 30, 2006 and make it impossible for the parties to use the G pension more than three months from the scheduled date for use of the container due to the reasons such as the Defendant’s completion site, or the Defendant’s performance of the contract becomes impossible, the Plaintiff and the designated parties

However, it is inevitable for the defendant to use the penture other than this penture.