1. On August 23, 2007, the Defendant registered with the Seoul Central District Court on the registration of the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court with respect to the land size of 482.8 square meters to the Plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The deceased A (hereinafter “the deceased”) is the defendant’s leader and the father of the defendant’s denied F.

B. 1) G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) as the creditor of the Deceased.

) A voluntary auction (Seoul Central District Court I, J, hereinafter referred to as “the voluntary auction of this case”) shall be held against the real estate owned by the deceased (Seoul Seocho-gu and Seocho-gu Seoul E and H land buildings).

(2) In order to repay the debt for the auction of this case, the deceased filed an application for the money by the following methods:

On August 17, 2007, Plaintiff B withdrawn KRW 330 million from the deceased’s borrowed name account in the name of F, and deposited KRW 400 million into the general account in the name of F. Plaintiff B paid KRW 400 million to F) On August 23, 2007, the deceased accepted the cashier’s check of KRW 226,624 out of the money created as above from F, and repaid G’s debt to F. G with the cancellation of the registration of the creation of the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) and the real estate as indicated in paragraph (1) of the order of the deceased’s possession (hereinafter “the instant real estate”), and the Seoul Central District Court accepted the registration of the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the maximum debt amount”) as Seoul Central District Court: (a) on August 23, 2007; and (b) on August 30, 2007, Defendant B received the registration of the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the instant real estate”).

(2) On the other hand, on August 23, 2007, the Plaintiff and the Defendant borrowed KRW 320 million from the Defendant at the annual interest rate of 10% (hereinafter “the instant loan certificate”) with respect to the instant mortgage (hereinafter “the instant loan certificate”).

) was drawn up. [Ground for Recognition] Fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4 through 9 (including each number, if any, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply).

As a result of the response to each order to submit financial transaction information to K Bank and L Bank of this Court, the entire pleadings are written in Eul evidence 18.