1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Ⅰ. Basic facts

1. The deceased G (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) had six children, including Defendant C, D, E, and F, both of the Plaintiff, the South-Nam, Defendant B, and his father, who died in 1986, and died on December 18, 2014.

2. Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer in the above Defendant, on the ground of sale as of August 22, 198, the Seoul Central District Court No. 122104, which was received on August 22, 198, with respect to the 3-dong 1109, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I apartment (hereinafter “instant I apartment”)

3. On August 7, 2014, the Deceased prepared a testamentary gift of 1/5 shares to Defendant C, D, and F, and 2/5 shares to Defendant E, respectively, of each of the instant types of real property owned by the Deceased, as a notary public, No. 564, 2014.

On March 25, 1986, after the death of H with respect to each of the instant species of real estate, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the deceased due to the consultation division.

On January 5, 2015, the said Defendants completed the registration of ownership transfer based on the said legacy with respect to the shares of each of the above Defendants out of each of the instant units of real estate.

[Grounds for recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1-5-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

Ⅱ The parties’ assertion

1. Claims for the cause of claims;

A. On May 2, 1988, the Deceased’s assertion of the instant I apartment donation against Defendant B, purchased the instant I apartment with his own funds, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in Defendant B to make a subsequent donation after the title trust with Defendant B.

around February 2, 2013, Defendant B removed the Deceased who was killed in the instant I Apartment, and waived the inheritance share of each of the instant I Apartments owned by the Deceased on the condition that he was donated the I Apartments from the Deceased.

B. The Deceased’s assertion of KRW 150,000,000 as to the deceased’s donation of KRW 150,000 to Defendant E was removed from the instant I apartment, and thereafter, J apartment 103 Dong 1004,000 won as to the lease deposit.