The judgment below

Of those, the conviction against Defendant C shall be reversed.

Defendant

C Imprisonment of one year and six months, and suspension of qualifications of one year.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendants 1) In the part of the indictment of this case’s assertion that the indictment of this case is against the principle of an indictment only or misunderstanding of legal principles, the part stating the Defendants’ past activities such as “the Defendants consulted with North Korea in the anti-unscopic war and abolition of the National Security Act” is written in violation of the principle of an indictment only, and thus, the indictment of this case should be dismissed.

B) North Korea's assertion that North Korea is not an anti-government organization is old since North Korea has abandoned the hostile unification route, and North Korea's revolution is deemed to have been carried out by South Korea's "the people of South Korea", most of all, North Korea's assertion that North Korea is not a direct assertion for the hostile unification revolution in South Korea. Since the federal unification scheme asserted by North Korea is based on the premise that South and North Korea's "pro-Korean system and ideology" is recognized, it is not a hostile unification plan, but a hostile unification plan is not an anti-government organization, and North Korea cannot be viewed as an anti-government organization only on the ground that the Defendants' activities are not an anti-government organization (as to the facts stated in the original judgment, Paragraph 1 of Article 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act cannot be seen as an act of assistance to North Korea's political authority only by asserting that the Defendants' activities are not an act of assistance to North Korea (as to the facts charged in the first instance, Defendant C did not directly intervene in the process of producing and distributing the documents to the "EM 20."