1. The term "the term" means "the term "the term" means "the term or "the term" means "the term or "the term"

Ademb Association (Law Firm Bupyeong General Law Office, Attorney Manbol-won, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

May 11, 2004

Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2002Gahap5195 Delivered on June 26, 2003

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the court of first instance is revoked. The defendant will implement the procedure for registration of cancellation of ownership transfer, which was completed under No. 86879, Nov. 21, 2001, with respect to each real estate listed in the attached list No. 1, 3-A, (b), 4, and (5), to the plaintiff. The defendant will implement each procedure for registration of cancellation of ownership transfer, which was completed under No. 86878, with respect to each real estate listed in the attached list No. 2-A and (b) of the same list.

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance concerning this case is as follows: (a) the part of “No. 17 evidence No. 23-1 to No. 8, No. 24, No. 25, and No. 17,” as stated in the second 17th 17th 1 of the judgment of the first instance as to Paragraph (1) is changed to “part of evidence No. 23-1 to No. 23-8, No. 24, No. 25, and No. 17, which seems contrary to this,” and thus, it is cited by Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[Attachment]

Judges Cho Yong-ho (Presiding Judge)