beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B imprisonment for six months, and Defendant C for a fine of five million won, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who actually operates the above company as the representative director of Defendant C, Defendant B is a relative student of the above company, Defendant B is a person in charge of the sales, business, etc. of products of the above company, Defendant C is a company that was established for the purpose of cultivating vegetables on March 2, 2012, and was selected as a social company on December 1, 201 in accordance with the Social Enterprise Promotion Act.
1. On May 2014, Defendant A and Defendant B conspired to use the above money by receiving the above subsidies to use the company’s operating funds, operating expenses, and the Defendants’ living expenses. At that time, Defendant B explained the above contents to Defendant B. Accordingly, the Defendants received the above subsidies and then returned the said subsidies to Defendant B’s account.
Accordingly, on May 30, 2014, Defendant A submitted a subsidy application stating that Defendant A will use 30,000,000 won for the purchase of pipe-type fluor for the purchase of the purchase of the pipe-type fluor for the development of AA technology to the public officials in charge of economic promotion and affiliated affairs at the Seocho-si Office located at the center of Seocho-si, Seoul, the central level of 183,00,000 won, and the plan to support the development cost of the project.
However, in fact, even if the Defendants received the above subsidies, they did not intend to use the contents as described in the above application form for technical development costs, or purchase the ED ginseng cultivation machine, etc., and instead, they transferred the above subsidies to the customer (State) H, etc. as if they purchased the ED ginseng cultivation machine, etc., and received them, and received them, and used them as general company operation funds, business expenses, and the defendants’ living expenses.
Nevertheless, the Defendants are the Cheongcho-si Office and Gangwon-do Office.