The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the court below (three years of suspended execution, 40 hours of probation, pharmacologic treatment, 40 hours of an order to attend lectures, confiscation and collection in October) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case as well as reflects his mistake in depth, the defendant had no record of being punished as the same kind of crime or having no record of being sentenced to suspended execution or heavier punishment, and the defendant supported his family with certain occupation, etc., which are favorable to the defendant, or that the defendant administered phiphones over two times, and the defendant had a record of being punished several times prior to another type of crime; the defendant had been punished by a fine; the defendant had a record of being punished several times prior to another type of crime; in light of the sentencing of the similar case, considering the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the circumstance after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.