The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is very poor that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and against his mistake, the defendant did not have the history of being punished for the same kind of crime before, and that there is no family member to support the defendant. However, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the defendant had been punished several times for another type of crime before, although he had had had had had had previously been punished several times, he committed the crime of this case, and he did not transfer the phiphones in possession. In particular, the fact that the crime of deceiving women for the purpose of sexual intercourse is very poor, such as the fact that the nature of the crime is very poor, such as the equity of sentencing with the case of this case, the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the situation after the crime, the age, character and behavior of the defendant, and the circumstances of the punishment specified in the records and arguments of this case including the records and arguments of this case, the sentencing of the court below is too inappropriate.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.