1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is respectively against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant), KRW 157,481,084, and Plaintiff B, KRW 10,000,00, and Plaintiff C and D.

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Basic facts [The grounds for recognition: Evidence No. 1, evidence No. 2-1 through 4, evidence No. 3, evidence No. 16-1 through 20, evidence No. 16-1 through 23, evidence No. 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments No. 3];

A. On June 21, 2010, at around 20:39, E driven a F vehicle (hereinafter “instant Defendant vehicle”) and driven a two-lane between the two-lanes in the direction of the driver’s station in the direction of the driving direction of the Defendant’s vehicle while driving a two-lane between the two-lanes in the direction of the driver’s vehicle in the same direction as that of the Defendant’s vehicle while driving a two-lane in the direction of the driver’s vehicle in the direction of the direction of the driver’s vehicle in order to change the two-lane to the one-lane, and caused the Plaintiff’s injury to the Plaintiff, such as external cerebrovascular, etc.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

Plaintiff

B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A.

C. The defendant is the company that entered into an automobile insurance contract for the instant vehicle.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion of this case is that the plaintiff A suffered mental damage equivalent to KRW 488,383,696 [= property damage 388,383,696} = 100 million won [20 million won per annum 6,962,962,470 won per day-of-day, 6,962,470 won per day-of-day, 1,702,109,266 won per day-of-day, 9,804,90 won per day-of-day, 900 won per day-of-day, 20 million won per day-of-day, 50 million won per day-of-day, 3, and D]; the plaintiff Eul suffered mental damage equivalent to KRW 2,000,000 per day-of-day, and damages for delay against the defendant.

B. 1) According to the above fact of recognition of liability for damages, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case. 2) The defendant's assertion that the accident in this case occurred as to the defendant's assertion of exemption and counterclaim. The defendant's assertion that the accident in this case occurred by changing the plaintiff A driver'sto one lane, where the plaintiff A driver's right side part of the defendant's vehicle, where the plaintiff A driver's right side part is changed to one lane.