1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. With respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On September 30, 2017, while the Plaintiff’s vehicle is driving along the two lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes located in the exit zone that moves upstream from the east-dong, Seoul metropolitan circulation road, the upper part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was trying to change the two-lanes from the two-lanes to the three-lanes of the two-lane road (hereinafter “instant road”), along the two-lanes of the Plaintiff’s right side of the vehicle, at the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the vehicle (hereinafter “instant road”).

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

On October 30, 2017, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,092,00 as the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Items A 1 through 4, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The following circumstances revealed that the negligence ratio of the instant accident was recognized and the entire purport of the pleadings was displayed in the evidence revealed, namely, ① the Plaintiff’s vehicle, without examining the movement of the vehicle driving along the road running along that of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, immediately changed from the two lanes to the three lanes at the intersections of the instant road without examining the movement of the vehicle driving along that of the vehicle driving along the Plaintiff’s vehicle, leading to the Defendant vehicle running ahead of the instant vehicle, seeking to change the two lanes from the three lanes to the two lanes; ② the Plaintiff’s vehicle proceeding ahead of the Defendant’s vehicle driving along the instant road at the time of proceeding on the two lanes of the instant road, but the flow of the vehicle driving along the Plaintiff’s vehicle immediately before the instant accident occurred.