logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2015.04.02 2014고단292
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the food manufacturing and processing business chain C, which is located in Gyeongbuk-gun.

No person shall place any false labelling on the raw materials of foods or food additives.

From February 1, 2013 to August 30, 2014, the Defendant manufactured and sold D 112,205 g, E 90,064 g, by entering the beer and e, manufactured by C as raw materials of the product packing in the column of the product packing materials, even though he/she had to enter the beer peep into “beer peep.”

As a result, the defendant puts different indications on the raw materials of food.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on the photograph of “D” product, “E” product pictures, and field survey product photographs

1. Article 95 of the Food Sanitation Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Articles 95 subparagraph 1 and 13 (1) 2 of the same Act (Selection of Fine) of the same Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [this case’s “D” and “E” refer to raw materials used by a food manufacturer or processor for manufacturing or processing food, as a matter of principle, inasmuch as the crynasium pums pums pums pums pums pums made in Samyang KON, the Defendant asserts that the raw materials are not falsely labeled since it was made in cypums pums pums pums pums pums pums pums, which are used by the Defendant, and thus, it does not constitute crypums pums pums pums and pums pums pums. If the Defendant asserts, the Defendant’s “water pumscums pums” used by the Defendant in this case, and all “pums pums pums pums” consisting of raw materials used by the Defendant, and thus, food manufacturer or processor of food.

arrow