logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.11.30 2015고정774
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 7, 2015, around 13:00, the Defendant driven a 49c “dico” don without registration, which was not covered by the automobile mandatory insurance without obtaining a motorcycle driver’s license, from the front of the “Sapap Construction Co., Ltd.” located in the same city of the same city from the Do to the front of the “Sap Construction Co., Ltd.” located in the same city of the same city of the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Registers of driver's licenses and disqualified meetings of the main office;

1. Business registration certificate, certificate of transfer of a two-wheeled motor vehicle, and notification of the person who is a registered one;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning non-registered wheels photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 2 of Article 154 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act that choose a penalty, Article 46 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [limited to the maximum amount of both crimes] among concurrent crimes, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although there are some circumstances that may be taken into account the circumstances leading to the crime as alleged by the defendant as reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, considering various conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, criminal records, sentencing cases in the same and similar cases, the amount of fine specified in the summary order is not acknowledged as excessive, and there is no change in circumstances that may be considered in the sentencing after the summary order, and it is so decided as per Disposition by maintaining the amount of fine in the summary order

arrow