logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.20 2017노620
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) sentenced by the court below is too uneasy and unfair.

Judgment

The defendant's act of driving in violation of signal while drinking 0.180% alcohol level in blood so that customers are on board is shocked and shocked to the string of the string, and the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the

However, the defendant has a record of punishment of a fine of KRW 4 million due to a violation of the Trademark Act in 2006, and there is no record of the same crime as the crime in this case.

Defendant

The driving vehicle is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance (Evidence 5,37 pages). Meanwhile, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and circumstances after committing the crime, the lower court’s sentence is too uneasy and unreasonable.

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow